Personal tools
You are here: Home About this site Iraq dossier blog No record - no alibi
« September 2008 »
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        
Recent entries
Inquiry buried? cames 2008-08-18
Burying good news cames 2008-08-08
All too easy cames 2008-07-17
Iraq at the Frontline cames 2008-07-16
Cover-up - or hoax? cames 2008-07-10
Recent comments
Re:Cabinet Office shuts up shop smb1971 2007-09-20
Re:Sir Gus nails his colours to the mast Anonymous User 2007-06-04
Re:The truth about the Williams draft Anonymous User 2007-05-05
Re:The Nuclear Lies Simon 2007-05-03
Re:Beckett digs in Simon 2007-04-25
 
Document Actions

No record - no alibi

by Chris Ames posted at 2008-04-24 15:22 last modified 2008-04-24 15:22

The Tribunal has now issued its ruling (pdf) in a case in which I challenged the Information Commissioner's acceptance of a claim by the Cabinet Office that it had no record of who drafted the dossier's executive summary at the time that the worst sexing up happened. The Tribunal partially held in my favour, while siding with the Commissioner and government on the substantive point. However, it did criticise the Cabinet Office for the lack of any audit trail.

In this sense, the ruling represents a good outcome. the Tribunal said:

"we are not very impressed by the quality of the record keeping… this was on any view an extremely important document and we would have expected, or hoped for, some audit trail revealing who had drafted what."

Having conceded that its spin doctors may have contributed to the key changes at this time, which included the fabrication of a number of highly disupted judgements such as the 45 minutes claim, the government cannot now prove that it did not sex the dossier up.

New Statesman article


Powered by Plone CMS, the Open Source Content Management System

This site conforms to the following standards: